Home Page
Announcements
Alternate Histories
International Edition
List of Updates
Want to join?
Join
Writer Development Section
Writer
Development
Member Section
Join Club ChangerS
Editorial
Chris Comments
Book Reviews
Blog
Letters To The Editor
FAQ
Links Page
Terms and Conditions
Resources
Donations
Alternate Histories
International Edition
Alison Brooks
Fiction
Essays
Other Stuff
Authors
If Baseball
Integrated Early
Counter-Factual.Net
Today in Alternate History
This
Day in Alternate History Blog
| |
Book
Review: 1940: Myth and Reality
This history of 1940 cuts away at the myth of survival
against the odds and Churchillian bravado during the first year of World War II.
It shows what the real situation was, how government reacted, the reality of
Anglo-American relations, and the relations between London and the Commonwealth.
For the last 50 years 1940 has been regarded as Britain's finest hour. In this
book, however, Clive Ponting reveals that the truth was deliberately hidden both
at the time and subsequently. This study also shows how the events and myths of
1940 have come to influence Britain's post-war history.
Some important details from this book:
- That
the British fumbled the ball constantly and played mainly into Hitler’s
hands. The one time they did
run with the ball, it worked out in Hitler’s favour.
- That
the British Empire was a HUGE strategic liability, but the British could not
bring themselves to abandon any part of it.
- That
French pressure and incompetence not only cost the French their freedom, but
nearly lost Britain’s only army.
- That
American pressure and/or the desire to please America made it impossible to
reach any sort of agreement with Japan.
- That,
barring unlimited American help, Britain could not continue to wage war past
mid-1940. As the war spread,
Britain remained on the verge of bankruptcy.
- That
Britain was unable to reach any sort of agreement with the USSR until 1941,
after Barbarossa, and the USSR proved an unpleasant ally.
- That
America, far from helping the British out of the goodness of their hearts
(or even the age-old principle of funding the fighter to keep your possible
rival busy), acted to reduce or cripple Britain even when supplying Britain
with supplies.
- That
Britain seriously considered bartering away parts of the empire to make
peace with the Nazis.
- That
Britain marginalized Charles De Gaulle, preferring to try to reach an
agreement with Vichy until it was too late to stop him hating/distrusting
Britain.
- That
Britain, despite some innovations, was technically backwards compared to
Germany, the US and Japan.
- In
fact, in a few cases, the British relied on imports from Germany!!
- That
the British suffered from a lack of realism when it came to the strength of
Germany, the willingness of America to help and the strength of the axis
alliance.
|