Updated Sunday 15 May, 2011 12:18 PM

   Headlines  |  Alternate Histories  |  International Edition


Home Page

Announcements 

Alternate Histories

International Edition

List of Updates

Want to join?

Join Writer Development Section

Writer Development Member Section

Join Club ChangerS

Editorial

Chris Comments

Book Reviews

Blog

Letters To The Editor

FAQ

Links Page

Terms and Conditions

Resources

Donations

Alternate Histories

International Edition

Alison Brooks

Fiction

Essays

Other Stuff

Authors

If Baseball Integrated Early

Counter-Factual.Net

Today in Alternate History

This Day in Alternate History Blog



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Castles of Steel: Britain, Germany, and the Winning of the Great War at Sea

Robert K. Massie, who wrote Dreadnaught, a study of the politics behind the Anglo-German naval race and the British entry into the First World War, as well as books on Russian history and whose wife was an advisor to president Regan, has recently re-entered the book writing club with this new book.  Castles of Steel, which explores the naval side of the Great War, is the story of the British and German struggle for superiority in the North Sea. 

Massie begins with a short overview of material he covered in Dreadnaught.  He notes how the Kaiser was determined – from long-standing feelings of inferiority – to build a navy comparable to Britain’s.  This particular obsession concerned Britain enough to come to an agreement with their traditional foes – the French – and even to make an accommodation with the Russians.  Massie discusses the chain of events that led to the First World War in an interesting, but cursory manner, which is unsurprising, given that most books on the naval war skip over the background entirely.  However, the reader is left with a good background to understand the reminder of the book, while the advanced reader can skip over that chapter to reach the meat of the book.  As one of Massie's greatest skills as a writer is his ability to create short but thorough sketches, whither political, technological or biographical, there is a great deal of information contained within the first and following chapters. 

The meat of the book, of course, is the war itself.  Massie describes battles in details that enable to reader to cover ground quickly – in places the book reads like a novel – and to discover how the battles turned out the way they did.  Massie does not shy away from discussing ‘what-if’ situation; he notes that if the British Mediterranean fleet was commanded by a Nelson, the British might have chased the Germans into Italian waters and sunk them there.  Further, what if the Goeben had managed to attack the French transports, perhaps creating a slaughter and weakening the French? 

There is also a study of the role of battleships.  The navies of the world strove to build or purchase such ships – but did not have the slightest idea what to do with them afterwards, during wartime.  The development of new technologies was not aided by a doctrine that allowed for using the new ships.  The British did not understand the value of convoys until it was almost too late, while the Germans failed to grasp their advantages and strike fast, or indeed build plenty of submarines until the war was well advanced. 

Massie spends considerable time on Churchill.  More than any other figure in the book, Churchill can be counted as the ‘hero’ or ‘villain’.  His plans to use the fleet aggressively could have lost the British the war, but they also allowed the British to develop their new technologies and experiment with new ideas.  Churchill, however, attempted to run the war by remote – using radio – a technique that caused considerable confusion and delay. 

FeedBack Form

Hit Counter