Whig Revolution

Updated Sunday 15 May, 2011 12:18 PM

Whig Revolution

by Eric Lipps

Author says, the September 2008 Edition of History Magazine included a feature article 'Trouble in Parliament' in which William Stroock looks at the Whigs' opposition to King George III (pictured) on the eve of the American Revolution. In this thread we look at a changed scenario for William Pitt, Edmund Burke and Charles James Fox where the American Revolution inspires the Whigs to challenge for the mastery of the British State itself. threads written by Eric Lipps with conceptual contributions from Eric Oppen and Ed.

In 1796, the so-called 'Whig Revolution' begins in England.

Whig Revolution by Eric Lipps

It will eventually end in the forced abdication of England's King George III (pictured) and the installation of his son, Prince George, as a constitutional monarch with sharply limited powers, as Parliament assumes de facto supremacy.
Twenty years ago on this date, dissident American colonists assembled at the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia voted down a proposed 'declaration of independence' following the refusal of its drafter Thomas Jefferson to remove a hostile reference to the African slave trade. The armed rebellion which had begun with the battle of Breed's Hill the previous year had quickly fallen apart after that, and King George III, determined to squash the spirit of rebellion once and for all, had slammed down a mailed fist upon the thirteen disobedient colonies.
But his harsh response, which included the creation of a red-shirted 'Order Police' empowered to use any means it chose to combat alleged sedition and subversion, has not produced peace so much as sullen submission. Rebel groups of one sort or another, many receiving aid from foreign powers such as France, Spain and the Netherlands, still carry out sabotage and seek through propaganda to stir up sentiment for a second attempt at revolution. The economy of the colonies continues to stagnate, too, under policies designed to keep America dependent upon Britain for manufactured goods; only shipping, which produces the vessels needed to carry raw goods from America to Britain and finished ones back, has been allowed to flourish.
Even in England itself, dissatisfaction has grown steadily. Growing public awareness of the ways in which the colonists are being deprived of what British subjects see as basic rights guaranteed by the Magna Carta and centuries of tradition has given rise to the fear that what has been done across the water may be done in the home islands. And influential figures in commerce and politics are increasingly dissatisfied with what they see as a costly and destructive occupation. Calls for reform, however, have been ignored or defied by the king, who appears to feel that as monarch by 'divine right' he need not listen to critics. In fact, he has lashed out at several of them publicly, and on May 3, 1800, had threatened to dissolve Parliament outright if it again raised the issue of his American policies.
It was this outburst which would prove to be the final straw. Meeting privately at the country home of William Pitt, a cabal which included Pitt himself, Edmund Burke and Charles James Fox, along with several other lesser figures, discussed what Burke would describe in his diaries as 'the direction of the country,' reluctantly agreeing that King George's continued reign and the continuation of the policies he supported would prove harmful to Britain's 'best interests.'
Burke had emerged as a sharp critic of post-rebellion colonial policy, which he saw as siphoning British resources while interfering in the natural operation of the marketplace. Before the American rebellion, Charles Fox had denounced the taxation of the colonies without their consent, and once actual fighting erupted he had called for a negotiated settlement; the collapse of the revolt had very nearly meant the collapse as well of his political career, which it had taken him years to rebuild. Pitt, who had once been much less sympathetic to the colonies than his father, the elder William Pitt, had come to believe that the king's policies after the rebellion were all but guaranteeing another uprising at some point, this one perhaps backed by foreign powers as the first had not been.
Pitt and Fox had more personal motivations: both believed they had seen evidence that the king, who had contracted porphyria, was showing signs of mental instability. They shared that concern with their fellow conspirators, who acknowledged that if the king were indeed losing his faculties he must be removed for the good of the nation, quite apart from specific considerations of policy.
The actual coup required months of planning, during which measures were taken to line up both political and military support for the plan. The timing of the strike itself, two decades to the day after the rejection of the attempted declaration of American independence, is pure coincidence, but conspiracy theorists will insist that the plotters were working with colonial subversives - perhaps even with the hated Jefferson himself, believed to be in exile in New Orleans under Spanish protection.

In 1820, the deposed former King George III of England dies at Windsor Castle.

Tory Counter-revolution by Eric Lipps

His son, George IV, has been ruling since the success of the Whig Revolution of 1796, when a cabal led by Edmund Burke, Charles James Fox and the younger William Pitt forced George III to abdicate The royal powers and prerogatives of the younger George have been largely usurped by Parliament, which is determined to avoid a repetition of what it considers the disastrous reign of his father. King George has never been permitted to forget that he owes his position to Parliament and that Parliament can, if it chooses, depose him as it did his father. That knowledge has made him a diffident ruler.
However, conservatives have begun scheming for a restoration of the absolute monarchy of pre-revolutionary times. Believing that parliamentary supremacy has encouraged what they perceive as the growing 'impudence' of the American colonies, where revolutionary sentiment is still being fanned by such figures as the exiled Thomas Jefferson, now living in Paris, they are plotting to depose Charles IV and install a monarch of their own choice in a 'Tory counter-revolution'. Moreover, they believe that George IV's weakness has hampered Britain in its dealings with Napoleon, whose French Empire, largely unopposed by Britain, has become the pre-eminent power on the Continent and is working to detach the largely French-speaking province of Quebec from British-ruled Canada.
Prominent among the conspirators are a number of influential proponents of a Stuart restoration. Their choice to replace Charles IV is Charles Edward Stuart (pictured), illegitimate son of Charlotte Stuart (herself the illegitimate daughter of the previous Charles Edward Stuart, known as 'Bonnie Prince Charlie' to his partisans) and Ferdinand de Rohan, Archbishop of Bordeaux and Cambrai. Now thirty-five years old, the prince is seen as a legitimate heir on the basis of claims that Charlotte herself had been acknowledged by her father.
Ultimately, however, the plot will come to nothing, and the 'bastard prince Charlie' - as detractors quickly name him - will leave England in 1822 for the American colonies, taking up residence in Philadelphia under the assumed name of Charles de Roehenstart, a pseudonym derived from 'de Rohan' and 'Stuart.' He will provide financial backing for the construction of the earliest railroad in America, which opens for passenger service in June 1831. In 1854, now a very wealthy man, he will return to Scotland, where he will die, on October 28 of that year, in a carriage accident.

Author says, The September 2008 Edition of History Magazine included a feature article 'Trouble in Parliament' in which William Stroock looks at the Whigs' opposition to King George III on the eve of the American Revolution. In this post we look at a changed scenario for William Pitt, Edmund Burke and Charles James Fox where the American Revolution inspires the Whigs to challenge for the mastery of the British State itself.
Eric Oppen suggested a reference to Bonnie Prince Charlie's refusal of the American crown, and Eric Lipps has been kind enough to write this terrific post.

Steve Payne

Editor of Today in Alternate History, a Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In History That Never Occurred Today.

Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items explore that possibility. Possibilities such as America becoming a Marxist superpower, aliens influencing human history in the 18th century and Teddy Roosevelt winning his 3rd term as president abound in this interesting fictional blog.

Sitemetre

Hit Counter