| "Frémont named General-in-Chief 
    of Union Army" by Jeff Provine 
  
   Author 
    
    says: we're very pleased to present the first story from Jeff Provine's 
  
  excellent blog This 
    
    Day in Alternate History Please note that the opinions expressed in this 
  
  post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). 
     
     July 26th 1861, 
     
      on this day US President Abraham Lincoln promoted the Commander of the 
      Department of the West John C. Frémont to the upgraded position of the 
      General-in-Chief of Union Army.
 The American Civil War had raged for several months, and the northern 
      nation needed a commander for its armies. General Winfield Scott was 
      capable, but far too old to keep command over what he understood would be 
      a years-long war. Irvin McDowell's defeat at Bull Run showed that he was 
      incapable. Many believed George McClellan, commander of the Department of 
      Ohio, would be given the command, but his plans about an invasion of 
      Virginia from the west and a campaign along the Ohio River were the source 
      of much derision. Not even the political squawking of his acquaintance 
      Salmon P. Chase could push him for general.
 
 "Any elevation of Fremont would have been a 
      political threat to Abraham Lincoln's re-election ~ a politically stronger 
      Fremont would have diverted votes from the radical Republican Party wing" 
      - reader's comment Instead, President Lincoln named commander of 
      the Department of the West, John C. Frémont, to be his commander. Frémont 
      had been a noted explorer through the 1840s and California's first 
      senator, not to mention being the Republicans' first candidate for the 
      presidency. Despite being a Southerner from Atlanta, Frémont remained 
      staunchly loyal to his country. He seemed impetuous, and there had been 
      controversy about what may have been mutiny of his mounted rifles in the 
      Mexican-American War, but Frémont vowed to end the war as soon as 
      possible.
 
 A new story by Jeff ProvineGeneral Frémont would piece together his Union 
      Army for a fast invasion of Virginia. Instead of waiting for spring, 
      Frémont set out in September of 1861. He would prove ruthless against the 
      rebels, as many of his policies in Missouri had shown. Warnings came from 
      General Henry Wagner Halleck (Frémont's replacement in the west) of the 
      mess the general left behind, but these were ignored as simple backroom 
      military gossip.
 
 Frémont's campaign would be an initial success out of his impetuousness. 
      General Joseph E. Johnston, commander of the Southern Army of the Potomac, 
      would fall back, drawing Frémont deeper into Southern territory, where his 
      armies would wreak havoc. Newspapers from both the North and, especially, 
      the South decried the horrors of war. Finally, only five miles from 
      Richmond, at the Battle of Seven Pines (or of Fair Oaks to the Union) on 
      November 30, 1861, Johnston would counterattack. The battle was bloody and 
      inconclusive, except that Johnston had stopped the approach of Frémont.
 
 "Fremont might have pushed the Border States to 
      secede---as it was, it was a close-run thing." - reader's commentRather 
      than beginning a siege for the winter, Frémont regrouped for another 
      attack and assaulted the Richmond defenses. A more stalwart general may 
      have waited, but Frémont meant to end the war and end slavery. Just as 
      Confederate President Jefferson Davis pulled Johnston from command and 
      replaced him with his adviser Robert E. Lee, Frémont threw his soldiers 
      against the defensive works. It was a gamble that could have won the Civil 
      War for the Union.
 
 Instead, the attack proved to be a disaster. Dead piled up as Frémont's 
      troops were unable to crack the defenses. Lee held the city with 
      everything he could scrounge, and reinforcements poured in from all over 
      Virginia in the Southern counterattack, most notably General Jackson and 
      his Stonewall Brigade as well as the cavalry of JEB. Finally, on December 
      3, Frémont would die from wounds incurred the day before and the remnants 
      of the Union forces would retreat to Fort Monroe, where they had landed 
      months before.
 
 "And if McClellan had won, it's unlikely the war 
      would have dragged on so long thereafter" - reader's commentDespite 
      the terrible setback, Lincoln would refuse to allow the South to secede. 
      The retired Winfield Scott's "Anaconda Plan" called for the conquest of 
      the Mississippi, which would be initially a tactical success in 1862. But, 
      the bloodthirsty General Ulysses S. Grant would prove the undoing of the 
      United States as his losses during battles proved unacceptable. Numerous 
      battles began to turn potential victories into defeats from shortages of 
      men and materiel supplied. With logistics failing in both the western and 
      eastern theaters, Union troops would fail to catch up with Lee's Army of 
      the North before it took Harrisburg, PA. The Southern victory would cut 
      off Maryland and Washington D.C. from the rest of the Union. The 
      subsequent revolt in Maryland would cause another wave of secession, and 
      European nations would begin to recognize diplomatically the Confederate 
      States of America.
 
 George McClellan would win narrowly the election of 1864, ousting Lincoln. 
      While the war would drag on for another three years, eventually McClellan 
      would organize the Treaty of Washington of 1868. Peace would settle over 
      America for a time until border disputes in the coming decades again 
      caused friction between the two nations.
 
 
 
     
     Author 
    says in reality, McClellan, not Frémont, was named general-in-chief. 
    Though McClellan is legendary in history for his "cowardice" on the 
    battlefield (depending too much on lackluster intelligence from Pinkerton 
    scouts and spies), it was his understanding of logistics that arguably won 
    the war for the North. While tepid in battle, McClellan was able to use 
    1861-62 to organize his command, train troops, and provide for supply-lines. 
    The Union was not ready for a long war, but McClellan's patience and 
    distrust of fighting gave it the resources needed for victory. To view guest historian's comments on this post please visit the
    
    Today in Alternate History web site.
 
 
     Jeff Provine, Guest Historian of
    
    Today in Alternate History, a Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In 
    History That Never Occurred Today. Follow us on
    
    Facebook, Myspace and
    Twitter.  Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit 
    differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items 
    explore that possibility. Possibilities such as America becoming a Marxist 
    superpower, aliens influencing human history in the 18th century and Teddy 
    Roosevelt winning his 3rd term as president abound in this interesting 
    fictional blog. 
 
 
    
    Sitemetre  
    
     |