Northern Strategy by Steve Payne
Author
says: what if Stephen A. Douglas outfoxed Abraham Lincoln with a
Northern Strategy? Please note that the opinions expressed in this satirical
post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s).
In 1860,
Please click
to Digg our site.Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln was passed
telegrams shortly after midnight at an ice cream parlour in Springfield
Illinois reporting his failure to win an outright majority of free states
in the electoral college. The presidential election would now be
determined by a states vote in the House of Representatives.
Needless to say, the result was an absolute disaster for Lincoln. Having
established himself as a national figure during his debates with Stephen
Douglas during the 1858 race for the Senate, he had attempted to reverse
the outcome of that defeat with the obvious alternative strategy of
uttering barely a word during the campaign. In fact one of his few
utterances was to predict that only the Republicans could win the
election.
"Probable answer is that no President is chosen and
US is run by a deadlocked Congress for 4 years" - reader's commentBecause
Douglas had split the Democrat vote at the national convention by
committing to a free state's vote on slavery. This suggestion had
antagonised abolitionists who sought to prevent the adoption of slavery in
the new western states of the Union. At the same time the proposal had
angered southern democrats who stormed out of the convention, and promised
to back Breckinridge.
"This might have postponed the Civil War, at least
long enough for the South to calm down about John Brown. " - reader's
commentOf course Douglas was no fool. He had devised a winning
strategy understanding fully that he could not possibly unite Northern and
Southern Democrats on a common platform and therefore gain an outright
majority in the electoral college. Instead he sought to limit Lincoln's
majority by nurturing "fusion" candidates in key states. And the returns
from Indiana, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut tipped the balance
precisely as Douglas had predicted. Because a vote in the House of
Representatives would be based on that institution's very different set of
democratic calculations, based as there were upon an equitable vote by
state where the South was more likely to gain a more positive, negotiated
outcome.
Author
says to view guest historian's comments on this post please visit the
Today in Alternate History web site. This scenario was explored in the
Fall Edition of American Heritage Magazine.
Steve Payne, Editor of
Today in Alternate History, a Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In
History That Never Occurred Today. Follow us on
Facebook, Myspace and
Twitter.
Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit
differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items
explore that possibility. Possibilities such as America becoming a Marxist
superpower, aliens influencing human history in the 18th century and Teddy
Roosevelt winning his 3rd term as president abound in this interesting
fictional blog.
Sitemetre
|