|
Join Writer Development Section Writer Development Member Section
This Day in Alternate History Blog
|
WHO INVENTED PHOTOGRAPHY?
A "Time for Patriots" Story
by Thomas Wm. Hamilton
While historians, such as Edolphus Frobisher (1) and Paul Elliott
Penwiper (2), have long attributed the invention of photography to the work of
Ralph Desmond in 1827, there have been persistant rumors of earlier
photographs. I believe that in going through the effects of a deceased
collector I may have found undisputable evidence of much earlier photography.
Nehemiah S. Barnstable was born in 1771 in Ipswich, Massachusetts.
During the Revolution he was orphaned, and having no surviving family members
prepared to take responsibility for the child, was at first left as a burden
on the town. However, he became one of a small group of children taken into
North Shore Military Academy, and raised and educated there. He graduated the
school in 1789, and moved west, settling in what later became Ohio. He never
married. His subsequent contact with the school and other alumni is not
recorded, and attempts to obtain information from North Shore Military Academy
have been ignored except to confirm the facts above.
Barnstable died in 1835. He left his property, a thirty acre farm with
small house and a barn, to the academy, but before anyone from there could
travel to Ohio to examine what he left, a great fire swept through the area,
destroying not only Barnstable's home and property, but that of over twenty
other owners in the area. The land, including not just Barnstable's, but also
that of his former neighbors, lay fallow for decades, being in the flood plain
of a river as well as being susceptible to additional brush fires.
In 1874, as part of a class in American history, I led a group of
students from Ohio State University to the area devastated by the 1835 fire.
The intent, other than class experience and training, was to determine if
anything of interest had survived. The first five sites explored turned up
various minor metal and ceramic objects such as might be expected to be found
on a farm and in a farming family home of the era. Nothing of exceptional
interst turned up except for some mementos of the 1832 Presidential election
at the second site, suggesting that the family there were strong supporters of
the Whig Party. A couple minor items from the subsequent Ohio gubernatorial
election seem to confirm this.
Barnstable's homestead was the sixth one examined, and given the time
constraints, was to be the last for this particular class. In digging, one of
the students discovered a buried vault, apparently undisturbed since the
fire. Upon opening the vault, we discovered a number of items which had
survived their decades underground quite well. These included several books,
items such as uniforms and insignia associated with being a cadet at North
Shore Military Academy, and two books of photographs, each labelled
"yearbook". The student who found thess noted opening pages that showed
various scenes at NSMA, and cadets engaged in various activities, and posing
for individual portraits. The books were handed to me, and I added them to
the collection to be examined later.
Back at my office at Ohio State, it was several weeks before I had the
time to look into the books of photographs. One of the first things I noticed
was that two of the pictures (one in each book) had what seem to be flags with
fourteen stars and stripes crossed with flags that distinctly have but
thirteen stripes (the bottom white stripe is missing), and an uncertain but
very large number of stars. My estimate suggests there are a total of fifty
stars on the second flag. Since the Revolution involved fourteen states, no
flag ever had fewer than fourteen stars and a similar number of stripes. And
why a flag which has but thirteen stripes, and what is clearly even more stars
than the 38 we have today? When would such pictures have been taken? Why
would such a flag have been created? The scenes with these flags seem to show
a graduation ceremony.
The most curious photographs are two which appear to show Benjamin
Franklin visiting NSMA. It is known, of course, that he did visit there once,
after the war (see Life of Franklin, A Man for America, Lillian
Detwiler, 1817). The purpose was to check the well being of the war orphans
adopted by the school. This was done at the behest of Washington. But this
was decades before any suggestion of the existence of photography. Yet, we
find among the photographs one that is labelled as showing the fourth grade
class. This is approximately the grade Barnstable would have been in when
Franklin visited. And one of the cadets is identified as being "N.
Barnstable". All cadets below the ninth grade are identified only by initial
and last name.
The second book appears to include Barnstable as a cadet in his last year
before graduation. He has the rank of corporal, and his name is written as
"Nehemiah Barnstable", with his birthplace noted.
If these are legitimate, then photography of a high quality must have
existed for at least four decades before Ralph Desmond introduced it--years
before his birth, in fact. It is curious that Desmond is a graduate of North
Shore Military Academy, and suggests, at least to me, that photography may
have been invented there and kept a private secret until Desmond chose to
reveal it. If true, NSMA may have some historically valuable photographs of
people whose pictures are not available, such as George Washington himself.
Queries on this, unfortunately, have drawn no response from the school.
1. Frobisher, E. "The Camera's Eye", Journal of the History of
Technology, March 1852.
2. Penwiper, P. ""Positiving the Negative", Camera Times, January
1861.
|