|
Join Writer Development Section Writer Development Member Section
This Day in Alternate History Blog
|
A
Winter of Less Discontent
©
Final Sword Productions 2003 The
Italian campaign of 1943-44 was to most fair observers a giant waste of men and
munitions. It could be offered as a
case study of how not to run grand strategy in a major war.
Essentially the West invaded North Africa in late 1942 because they
needed to do something against Hitler but could find nothing else to do.
A French invasion in 1942 failed of shipping losses [King and FDR botched
the opening phases of the Battle of the Atlantic with a giant helping hand from
Churchill and Bomber Command – Roundup may not have been possible anyway but
these decisions made it so]. The
same shipping problems made direct American reinforcement of Egypt impossible.
That left North Africa. It
did not directly face the Nazis but it was a blow at a Nazi minor ally [Vichy].
It was the first step in opening the Mediteranean which would help the
shipping shortage [the perpetual shortages of shipping and amphibious craft
would drive much of Western strategy throughout the war]. The
French garrison in North Africa proved less willing to defect than the plan
projected [yet another version of rosy scenario].
This was magnified by both Ike’s operational conservatism and the
political firestorm over the deal with Darlan.
To make matters still worse Monty made his usual botch of the pursuit of
Rommel and Hitler refused to follow the script.
Instead of evacuating North Africa, Hitler poured more men into Tunisia
than he sent to relieve Stalingrad. He
lost the 6th Army but tied down the Anglo Saxons for far longer than
they had allowed for. Tunisia
does not fall until early May of 1943. This
leaves the West with few options. It
is too late to redeploy in time to invade France so the alternatives are do
something in the Mediteranean or do nothing for the balance of the year.
Shipping and British pressure dictate the next two moves.
Sicily is taken in July and August.
Again Ike is too conservative in his planning [a division landed into the
Italian toe would have forced the evacuation of Sicily instead of slugging up
the mountainous interior]. The
landings at Salerno south of Naples in September are a complete disaster.
Mark Clark almost gets himself driven into the sea by an inferior German
force racing against time before Monty can crawl into the Axis rear from Tarento
and Brindusi. However, a bit of
luck [a Camorra [underworld] led rising] secures the port of Naples largely
intact. By mid October the twin
goals of Naples and the airfields at Foggia are in Western hands.
However, German resistance is stiffening and the weather is rapidly
turning bad. It
is here we will have our point of departure from real history.
The major POD is that Patton’s staff does a better job of handling
their highly competent but emotionally unstable general so that the ‘slapping
incidents’ do not happen. So
Patton is left in command of 7th Army in Sicily instead of being
relieved. The minor POD’s flow
from this. Ike was
ultraconservative on the ratio of support to combat formations.
In OTL he broke up one US and four Free French divisions over this winter
for manpower for rear area units. My
ATL will presume that Patton prevents this from happening.
There were obvious other things that could have been done, especially in
the use of Italian manpower as service and support units to keep Americans and
French in combat service. The
general belief is that the slapping incidents kept Patton from Bradley’s job.
This is certainly possible. However,
I will argue here that this is far from certain.
Ike was quite conservative in his generalship.
Bradley was the safe choice. Patton
has a far better field commander. However
he was a prima donna and a lose cannon. Ike
already had one of those in Monty. Presume
that he opted for the safe choice and brings Bradley back with him to the UK for
US 1st Army which will lead to 12th Army Group. Mark
Clark would still have been given Salerno.
Ike had two US Army headquarters in the theater.
Patton’s did Sicily while Clark planned Salerno.
So Clark at Salerno and beyond leaves Patton free to plan something.
In fact there was no real plan after taking Naples and Foggia.
It was all opportunism. So
we will let George dream grandly, as George tended to do.
We will let him involve himself with the mostly French parallel campaign
to liberate Sardinia and Corsica. He
accomplishes nothing more than the Free French did in OTL, but the flamboyant
Patton brings major publicity to these operations which in OTL were all but
ignored by the press. In
OTL we essentially attacked north from the Vulterno to Cassino out of inertia.
No one would make the decision to go on the defensive for the winter
despite poor terrain and worse weather. Churchill
wanted Mediteranean offensives. Clark
wanted promotion possibilities. From
this came three butcher’s battles at Cassino.
Instead
George comes up with an alternative – land in southern France.
There was still enough shipping and amphibious craft in the Mediteranean
for a major landing [January 1944 at Anzio in OTL}.
The Overlord plan was for a simultaneous landing in southern France.
So George could argue that he was advancing the plan rather than haring
off into someplace secondary. Under
Marshall’s strategy France was much more important than Italy.
So why push for Rome when you could have Marseilles [one of the great
ports of Europe and a logistic necessity to make Ike’s campaign work]? So
presume that in December of 1943 Patton lands with 6 divisions along the actual
OTL 1944 southern French invasion beaches.
Presume that with a Patton commanding they do not get pocketed the way
Lucas did at Anzio [better exploitation, many fewer German reserves].
Presume that Marseilles is taken intact [in OTL it was in the summer of
1944 when the Germans were far better prepared].
The Allies go onto the defensive in Italy.
Patton gets all the Free French forces, the Polish Mountain Corps, the
British First Airborne Division, the three US divisions used in Anzio in OTL,
the US 1st Armored Division, the US 2nd Cavalry Division
[this is the one Ike disbanded in Tunisia in OTL] and the five US divisions that
in OTL were pulled back from the Mediteranean for Overlord [replace with five
divisions from the US – they were more divisions in the US by this time than
there were places to put them]. So
he builds up to twenty divisions over the winter, getting the Sixth Army Group
which in OTL went to Devers. What
happens? First
Normandy gets much easier. The
major part of the German mobile reserves in the West are drained off to oppose
Patton. It also drains off Rommel
personally. In OTL Rommel spent the
winter converting the Atlantic Wall from a couple of fortified ports into a real
obstacle. Without Rommel and with a
major front draining resources this simply doesn’t happen.
Rommel will contain Patton. There
is only one real line of advance, the Rhone Valley.
Rommel can block that while slowly giving ground in the mountains of the
Massif Central and Alps. Hypothetically
make the point where the advance ends at Avingon.
Plus or minus 30 klicks of there is as good a guess as any but it
doesn’t matter. A real bridgehead
bleeds the Germans in France for half a year.
There
will be severe limits on how many divisions the Germans can be pulled from
Italy. Even with the West clearly
in winter quarters, the Germans will have to guard Rome and both coasts.
Throughout the war the Germans always overestimated Western amphibious
capacity. The flip side of
Kesselring’s decision to defend Italy south of Rome is that it tied up an
extra ten German divisions. Anzio
ran into those divisions. Patton
wouldn’t. Second,
with Marseilles in Western hands DeGaulle would get a capital on French soil
half a year early. DeG was a
handful. However Patton was always
better with the French than Ike. [Ike
was better with the British]. A
Free French administration created at a more sedate pace over this time scale
would make far better use of metropolitan French manpower.
Also more French will choose sides earlier.
In OTL most French sat on the fence until just before Normandy.
In this ATL occupying France becomes much more difficult months sooner,
making the Normandy landings still easier. Third,
the major air battle of the period will now be over France, especially southern
France instead of over central Germany. The
German Air Force will be attrited worse and faster than in OTL.
We will have air bases putting fighters and medium bombers over central
and eastern France by January of 1944 instead of October of that year.
This again makes Normandy easier. Fourth,
this easier Normandy will have an easier time exploiting as there will be air
and logistics bases already in the Rhone Valley plus a simultaneous breakout
offensive similar to Diadem in OTL. Essentially
the advance reaches the Rhine along its full length in September – October of
1944 with even fewer German escaping the Allied sweep.
We still may not take Berlin but that will be political choice. Of
course the flip side of this is that Trieste and parts of northeast Italy are
annexed by Italy at war’s end or there is an immediate crisis between Tito /
Stalin and the West. |