| Mokusatsu  by Steve Payne 
     Author 
    says: what if the US Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson had not 
    honeymooned in Kyoto1? Please note that the opinions expressed in 
    this post do not necessarily reflect the views of the author(s). The 
    photograph shows the Emperor during an Army Inspection in 1938. 
     
      On August 6th 1945,
     
      the US Army Air Force dropped an atomic bomb on the Imperial Capital City 
      of Kyoto killing the Emperor Hirohito as he prepared to break with a 
      centuries-old protocol of official silence by instructing the Japanese 
      Government to accept the Allies terms for unconditional surrender.
 USAAF a-bombs Kyoto, killing Emperor 
      Hirohito before he can end the policy of MokusatsuAt a similiarly 
      fateful meeting held in Los Alamos on May 10th, a committee 
      chaired by J. Robert Oppenheimer had identified Kyoto, Hiroshima, 
      Yokohama, and the arsenal at Kokuraas as suitable targets for the bomb. 
      When an expert on Japan, Professor Edwin O. Reischauer strongly disagreed 
      with the inclusion of Kyoto his argument forced the "City of Temples" to 
      the top of the list. Because hardliners in the US Government judged that 
      Kyoto was precisely the symbolic target they sought for destruction. In 
      addition, the city was an important centre for military industry, as well 
      an intellectual center. And so the decision was made.
 
 "The last ditch battle out side of Tokyo is extreme 
      [unlikely]" - reader's commentIn a sense the hardliners chose well 
      because the US Government surely did succeed in making an unanswerable 
      expression of authority. But the effects on the Empire of Japan were 
      tragically misjudged. Not only was a key voice of moderation removed at a 
      critical juncture, but also a transitional post-war figurehead was 
      eliminated. With the publication of the Sugiyama memo, President Truman 
      later argued (somewhat disengeniously) that the Emperor had the supreme 
      command of the Japanese Army and the Navy and would almost certainly have 
      been executed on the orders of the Tokyo Trials.
 
 Ironically, whilst Hirohito had adopted the traditional protocol 
      of remaining officially silent during the military councils, his 
      commanders had insisted upon a policy of "mokusatsu", treating the Allies 
      demands for surrender with a silent contempt. But now that silence had 
      been broken. Believing that the Allies meant to destroy Japan as a 
      distinct cultural entity, Military High Command abandoned the remaining 
      Home Islands in order to concentrate their still considerable land forces 
      in the defence of the Tokyo Plains.
 
 
 
     
     Author 
    says 1) the source article
    
    Who Saved Kyoto? in the New York Times reports: the credit belongs to 
    Henry L. Stimson, Secretary of War in the Roosevelt and Truman 
    administrations, who twice visited Kyoto in the 1920's, was conscious of its 
    irreplaceable cultural assets and concerned for the postwar reputation of 
    the United States. He committed himself to keeping the city off the target 
    list and stuck to that decision in the face of many who urged its atomic 
    bombing. To view guest historian's comments on this post please visit the
    
    Today in Alternate History web site.
 
 
     Steve Payne, Editor of
    
    Today in Alternate History, a Daily Updating Blog of Important Events In 
    History That Never Occurred Today. Follow us on
    
    Facebook, Myspace and
    Twitter.  Imagine what would be, if history had occurred a bit 
    differently. Who says it didn't, somewhere? These fictional news items 
    explore that possibility. Possibilities such as America becoming a Marxist 
    superpower, aliens influencing human history in the 18th century and Teddy 
    Roosevelt winning his 3rd term as president abound in this interesting 
    fictional blog. 
 
 
    
    Sitemetre  
    
     |